Round-up: 2016 Formula 1 cars were best for racing says Ricciardo, and more | RaceFans Round-up

Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull, Circuit de Catalunya, 2016

Round-up: 2016 Formula 1 cars were best for racing says Ricciardo, and more

RaceFans Round-up

Posted on

| Written by Keith Collantine


Welcome to Friday’s edition of the RaceFans round-up.

Comment of the day

The deficiencies of Aston Martin’s car have masked how Lance Stroll has closed the gap to Fernando Alonso, argues Ben:

Do you still think Alonso is that good? If you do, then Stroll on race day has improved and is getting quite close to ‘Alonso level’ on race days. The pace difference between them has not been big, and not last year either.

Stroll has significantly cut down on his errors and his I would even say his overtaking skills are pretty good. His weaknesses are one lap pace and seeming like he pretends he can’t see in his mirrors, although he hasn’t had those incidents recently.

I would say that now, Alonso is average at best, and Stroll is just underwhelming now rather than terrible.
Ben Rowe (@TheGiantHogweed)

Social media and links

Worlds collide – Daly and Ricciardo (Speed Street)

Daniel Ricciardo: ‘The car I probably loved the most was 2016. By then, that was year three of that era, so development was pretty good. The cars were narrow, they were small, they felt more like a go-kart where you had room on the track to like move around and get some clean air and launch overtake. We’re not braking right at the apex of the corner. That was the coolest, I felt probably the most comfortable racing that car.’

News and reactions from Qualifying One (Nurburgring 24 Hours)

‘The weekend of the 54th ADAC 24h Nuerburgring kicked off on Thursday afternoon amid typical Eifel weather. After rainy conditions at the start of Qualifying One and numerous spins, there were some fast lap times on a dry track midway through the session, before heavy rain and even hail set in toward the end. The first benchmark time of the weekend was set by the number 80 Mercedes-AMG with a lap of 8:14.957 minutes. The defending champions in the number one Rowe BMW followed in second place, 3.112 seconds adrift. Third fastest was the number three Verstappen Mercedes-AMG ahead of the number 99 Rowe BMW.’

Nuerburgring Thursday Notebook (Sportscar 365)

‘While the majority of the mainstream attention has been on Max Verstappen, in his highly anticipated N24 debut, the four-time Formula 1 world champion is not being made available to the media this weekend, which is understood to have be a contentious topic within the press corp, particularly the number of F1 journalists who are covering this event specifically because of the Dutchman’s appearance.’

V8 Formula 1 cars a matter of ‘when, not if,’ says FIA president (Car and Driver)

‘First of all, you have to get the power. You can’t get the power with less than a 2.5 or a 2.6, so you’re talking about 2.6 to 3.0 litres. Then, having a 10 percent (energy split), you will get to the 880 horsepower, but then the car (combustion engine) will be about 650 horsepower.’

TV audience dips for Indy GP (Racer)

‘The end of the 85-lap race featured a peak audience of 890,000 viewers from 6:45-6:57pm, and despite the drop in year-to-year broadcast consumption, Fox has maintained an average of 1,141,000 viewers across the six opening races.’

RaceFans always endeavours to credit original sources. Want to share a relevant motorsport link with us? Send it in via the contact form.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Happy birthday!

Happy birthday to Jonny!

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Published by

Keith Collantine

Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 – when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring journalist, Keith began running the site full-time in 2010, achieving a long-held ambition to dedicate his full attention to his passion for motor racing.
View all posts by Keith Collantine


Source: www.racefans.net

By

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *